joreth: (polyamory)

I came up with another possiblity for my post: http://joreth.livejournal.com/154250.html

*UPDATE #2* I just thought about possibly changing the name to polymedianetwork.com since I've pretty much ruled out polymediagroup.  The pros:  shorter than polymediaassociation; no double letters; the word "network" is very similar to "association" in connotation.  The cons: still longer than pma.com or polymedia.com; I have to change the name and the acronym to PMN and I don't know if I like how it looks as well as PMA; "network" implies a looser connection than "association" but not significantly so.

You can comment here, or you can go to the original thread (where I have added this at the bottom) to see all the other comments before commenting.

Date: 5/15/09 11:34 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] terriaminute.livejournal.com
IMHO, WIN. :-)

Date: 5/15/09 11:38 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] serolynne.livejournal.com
I think in the current realm of open source Web 2.0 and how folks are connecting online these days.. 'network' is a much stronger term.

Network implies a more equal footing and collaboration within for its members, where as association implies more of a hierarchy and a controlling board. And I think 'network' is a term used more within polyamory .. so that adds cool points there too.

Banners