I rant a lot about the poor treatment women (me, specifically) receive online from men. I find myself in a very unusual position. Outside of the internet dating arena, I usually find myself siding with men, when it comes to debates of the genders. I don't usually take the female side because the male side of the debate tends to make more sense to me. Yet, here I am, filling my journals with "you guys suck".
I want to make it clear that I do not think men suck. All my rants are directed towards a certain type of guy. In fact, I am quite enamored of the male portion of the population. And I think it's high time I said that. To that effect, I write an essay in favor of men.
I want to make it clear that I do not think men suck. All my rants are directed towards a certain type of guy. In fact, I am quite enamored of the male portion of the population. And I think it's high time I said that. To that effect, I write an essay in favor of men.
Men are very underappreciated. I hear all the time how women are the more attractive sex, both men and women like to look at women, but no one likes to look at men. Except, apparently, me. While everyone drools over the softer sex, smooth skin, sensuous curves, they concurrently disdain the thought of hairy butts and beer bellies. I think we are doing our entire species a grave disservice by denying ourselves the pleasure of enjoying a full half of our population. |
I love men. |
![]() |
I do. |
![]() |
What about those men who aren't smooth? Hairy men get such a bad rap. For some reason, we have collectively decided that only men who look like prepubescent boys are worthy sexual fantasies. Isn't there something a bit off about that? Now, I like looking at the smooth, hairless pretty boys too. But there are plenty of people extolling their virtues. I'm here to extol the virtues of the male population as a whole and those hairless, muscular pretty boys are a very small portion of the whole population. |
![]() |
There is a school of thought that women are more pleasurable to look at because of their curves. I disagree for two reasons. First, men have curves too. Second, curves are not the only beautiful line, ask any art major. Let's go with curves first. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
And as a woman, I can't stress this point enough: short nails. 'Nuff said. |
That is all just the physical beauty that is Man. There is more to Man than his shell, and those are also things of beauty. Take his voice, for instance. Men go wild for a sultry, exotic female voice, or a pure, sweet, clear soprano. There are poems and ballads sung to the dulcet tones of women. |
Ah, but to hear a man's voice! |
![]() The rich vibrancy of a tenor singing about love and hate and life and parties makes me close my eyes and brings a sense of peace, a thrill of excitement. The coarseness of work-roughened tones brush my insides the way his coarse body hair brush my outsides; a study in auditory-tactile sensation. The voice of man is so varied and complex, with the most incredible range of sounds and pitch. I think the concept of auditory pleasure is generally neglected in our society, but particularly that of the male voice. Aren't phone sex and phone dating businesses geared primarily towards men with hot-sounding women? |
And man's beauty doesn't stop with his body or his voice. His scent is subtly individual based on a combination of his soap, any cologne or aftershave he might use, and just the smell of HIM. There are all kinds of jokes made about a man's smell and a huge number of products designed to eliminate or mask it. But I think our over-industrialized society has forgotten the importance of the smell of the human body. Yes, sometimes things are more pleasant when the natural body smell is removed, or at least toned down, but that goes for pretty much all animals and quite a few plants too. I don't know quite how to describe men's smell because there's really nothing else like it that I know of. But no one else will ever smell like him, even if someone else uses the same cologne or soap. Just a hint of his scent can flood all the other senses with memory. The scent of him during sex can be a huge turn on, can emphasize and increase the pleasure when you open all your senses up to the moment. |
![]() |
I thought about not including this next part because it might be considered too vulgar and I’m trying to wax poetic about the beauty of man. But I have to include it because it is the quintessential symbol of “man” – the penis. The penis is seen as either an object of ridicule or a threat. Women are taught from a very young age to fear the penis and the wielders of the penis. All men are potential rapists and to be raped is a horror among horrors, possibly even worse than death itself. Women who have sex, either by force or by choice, are unclean, damaged goods. That piece of flesh is responsible for sullying our virtue, destroying that which makes us women, worthy of love. The only way to not fear the penis is to laugh at it. I’m not talking about the boys from Puppetry of the Penis, who intentionally poke fun at themselves. It’s OK to see the humor in the human body, after all, we can be quite silly. But what I’m talking about is the emasculation of men, to knock them down from their lofty positions of power by grinding them under our high heels, figuratively speaking, with our laughter and derision. |
![]() |
Man is inherently beautiful in all his incarnations. I am often quite appalled to hear disparaging remarks towards the male gender by people of both genders, especially when contrasted by positive remarks about females from these same people. I realize that everyone has a sexual orientation and only half the population is attracted to either gender. But for some reason, even the half that is sexually attracted towards men seems to find them unattractive! And even the half that does *not* find women sexually attractive still manages to be outwardly appreciative of feminine virtues. There have been great strides in equality for women. Women are valued for more than they ever have been before. And at the same time, women now have the freedom to admit their own interest and appreciation for men, instead of being the "guardians" of sex, they can express their sexuality and their sexual attraction like never before. But somewhere along the line, while earning our freedom and equality, we lost the appreciation for men. The standards of beauty for men are as strict as they have ever been for women, possibly stricter since it has become PC to appreciate the "normal woman" in recent years but it is not acceptable to appreciate the "normal man". Men are depicted in entertainment as either ultra-suave lady-killers or totally ugly, offensive, insensitive boobs who couldn't wipe their own ass if it weren't for their beautiful and intelligent wives who are too good for their disgusting husbands but somehow stick by them in spite of it all. If you're not James Bond, you're Homer Simpson, someone who is loved in spite of his appearance and personality. But if you are James Bond, all the other guys derisively chide you and call you gay! Because somehow, being classically beautiful and debonair is wrong too. There's something wrong with that. The overall message we send guys is that you are never good enough. You can't look good enough, be good enough, because if you do, you're not a "real man" either. And I think men are not the only ones who suffer for this attitude. I think we all suffer. Men are beautiful and I love everything about them. |
no subject
Date: 12/10/07 03:12 am (UTC)From:Me to!
no subject
Date: 12/10/07 03:42 am (UTC)From:Lord ha' mercy on me, and save me from too-obvious puns.
no subject
Date: 12/10/07 06:09 am (UTC)From:Thank you. *smile*
no subject
Date: 12/10/07 06:20 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 12/10/07 08:28 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 12/10/07 09:05 pm (UTC)From:I'm gonna link this when I get home.
Refreshing
Date: 12/10/07 10:37 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)no subject
Date: 12/13/07 02:44 am (UTC)From:The Homer Simpson phenomenon is offensive to women as well as men in that it portrays women who apparently want to be their husband's mother.
In general, I really don't like the idea that the price women pay for freedom and equality is the sudden conviction that all men are stupid pigs. It's the kind of patently untrue and illogical assertion made by people who think that feminists are hairy, man-hating dykes. Lots of people don't much like the idea of feminism because they have this totally wrong idea in their heads about feminists' attitudes toward men. One of the major points that second and third wave feminism has tried to make is that it's okay for women to love the cock (and respect its owner) without marrying it, cleaning its house, and having its babies.
Gee, see how I took a post about men and made it all about women? Oops. What I meant to say, and I'm very serious about this, is: I. LOVE. The cock. Mmm, cock. Shoulders are lovely, too. And the smell thing kills me. Whoo.
no subject
Date: 12/22/07 02:33 am (UTC)From:Of course it's also about anti-feminism, because whenever you start pigeon-holing either sex, you weaken both. Calling men animals that aren't capable of refraining from raping women hurts men, and it leads to attempts to "protect women" that mean taking away their freedoms.
However, the one point I actually want to make is that I think there is an age-related phenomenon being missed here. Women are beautiful - if they're young. Not all women are beautiful. Old women are often viewed as non-sexual, at least not sexually attractive. Although it's okay if they try to hide their age. Whereas older men are viewed as dignified. Grey hair on a male is often viewed positively, and it rarely is on a female.
So, young men are ugly animals, young women are beautiful, older men are dignified, older women are pitiable. And none of this is really all that sensible or healthy.
no subject
Date: 12/31/07 05:45 am (UTC)From:May I friend you?
no subject
Date: 12/31/07 05:58 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 12/31/07 06:02 am (UTC)From:I found you while going back through the past several months of LJ's "polyparents" and "polyamory" communities.
no subject
Date: 12/31/07 06:11 am (UTC)From: