I am bringing back the Percontation Point, which looks like ؟ (a backward question mark) and denotes sarcasm or irony in the sentence. With limited character space and lack of tone, I need all the help I can get telling others when I'm being sarcastic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation
It's kind of amazing how many people got upset at the suggestion of visually labeling online interactions as sarcastic or ironic (I found some message boards while researching the symbol). The most common response is "if you're too stupid to tell I'm not serious, you shouldn't be on the internet".
I'm rather appalled at that attitude. Without tone, and with lots of people reading who don't know the writer personally, I find it incredibly easy to misunderstand irony and sarcasm, and think someone is being serious when they're not.
I went off on someone for being a sexist asshole before he explained he was being sarcastic simply because I had never read that person's name or writing before and had no clue what his personality or viewpoint was. He even used some hashtag code that apparently means "I'm being sarcastic" that I had never heard before and can't remember now.
It would have been nice for both of us if I could tell at a glance that he meant the opposite of what he was saying the way I can tell when I hear or see someone speak.
**EDIT**
I went on a search for a convenient webpage to bookmark that had single character symbols that could be entered into text boxes like Twitter & Facebook status updates, so that I could copy and paste the character, rather than try to remember all the alt codes to do it. I found several good sources, but none of them had the percontation point, even though it is a text character and not an image. So I took the characters from the largest source of special characters, added the percontation point to it, removed the characters that didn't show up or that were duplicates, and uploaded it all as a public Google Doc.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cV6rGtnruVnU5pFwNMEPls318w1c5Pc9chipIHW367M/edit?hl=en_US
It's kind of amazing how many people got upset at the suggestion of visually labeling online interactions as sarcastic or ironic (I found some message boards while researching the symbol). The most common response is "if you're too stupid to tell I'm not serious, you shouldn't be on the internet".
I'm rather appalled at that attitude. Without tone, and with lots of people reading who don't know the writer personally, I find it incredibly easy to misunderstand irony and sarcasm, and think someone is being serious when they're not.
I went off on someone for being a sexist asshole before he explained he was being sarcastic simply because I had never read that person's name or writing before and had no clue what his personality or viewpoint was. He even used some hashtag code that apparently means "I'm being sarcastic" that I had never heard before and can't remember now.
It would have been nice for both of us if I could tell at a glance that he meant the opposite of what he was saying the way I can tell when I hear or see someone speak.
**EDIT**
I went on a search for a convenient webpage to bookmark that had single character symbols that could be entered into text boxes like Twitter & Facebook status updates, so that I could copy and paste the character, rather than try to remember all the alt codes to do it. I found several good sources, but none of them had the percontation point, even though it is a text character and not an image. So I took the characters from the largest source of special characters, added the percontation point to it, removed the characters that didn't show up or that were duplicates, and uploaded it all as a public Google Doc.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cV6rGtnruVnU5pFwNMEPls318w1c5Pc9chipIHW367M/edit?hl=en_US
no subject
Date: 11/7/11 12:25 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 11/7/11 02:03 pm (UTC)From:I like the idea of having an irony punctuation.
no subject
Date: 11/7/11 06:56 pm (UTC)From:The irony mark or irony point ( ؟ ) (French: point d’ironie) is a punctuation mark proposed by the French poet Alcanter de Brahm (alias Marcel Bernhardt) at the end of the 19th century used to indicate that a sentence should be understood at a second level (e.g. irony, sarcasm, etc.). It is illustrated by a small, elevated, backward-facing question mark.[3][5]
It was in turn taken by Hervé Bazin in his book Plumons l’Oiseau ("Let's pluck the bird", 1966), in which the author proposes several other innovative punctuation marks, such as the "doubt point" (
So, it would appear you use this at the end of the sentence to indicate that the sentence has "another layer" to it.
If you don't see the punctuation marks and you're reading this on a black background, click on the blank space between the ( ) for each mark. The marks are graphics that are black characters on a transparent background so you'll have to view it on a page that is not black.
no subject
Date: 11/7/11 07:13 pm (UTC)From:My browser crashed again! I LOVE going through my history to recreate each window with its dozens of tabs؟
Unhappy with your primary's relationship rules? Just ignore them. It's the easy, fun way to show someone what boundaries YOU want!؟
(the !?, btw, is its own punctuation mark, called the interrobang. It's usually one superimposed over the other (‽), but with keyboards, it can be written one after the other too. A sentence ending with an interrobang asks a question in an excited manner, expresses excitement or disbelief in the form of a question, or asks a rhetorical question.
For example:
You did what‽
You're pregnant‽)
I've given up on online communication
Date: 11/7/11 04:05 pm (UTC)From:I posted on FB about it the other day. After that, I've given up hope.
Re: I've given up on online communication
Date: 11/8/11 12:18 am (UTC)From:It was the thread a day or so ago about ghost hunting where someone said "Maybe someday science will figure out there're more than 3 dimensions" and I replied "Science has pretty well etsablished that already, TIME is the 4th" and in response I've gotten like a HUNDRED comments mocking science.
*sigh*
NOW I've given up hope.
no subject
Date: 11/7/11 05:39 pm (UTC)From:Wow, that's completely backwards. It should be: If the majority of people can't tell you were being ironic, then you need to be a better writer.
no subject
Date: 11/7/11 06:38 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 11/8/11 08:59 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 11/9/11 01:39 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 11/9/11 03:36 am (UTC)From:I aim to please!؟
Thanks
Date: 1/13/12 01:51 am (UTC)From:I do read your journal regularly, but don't respond because I usually don't have much to add, or am plain tired after a long day at work to be of any use. So here's a collective "Thanks" for all the informative posts.