https://medium.com/@sheaemmafett/10-things-i-wish-i-d-known-about-gaslighting-22234cb5e407

It's particularly subtle and effective when something bothers you, but you don't talk about it right away, or if the thing that bothers you is a *pattern* that has developed over time. That makes it so much more plausible and easy for the abuser to quiz and harangue you about the details of *factual events* about which you might be fuzzy after some time has passed. This way, they can focus the argument on the details of your memory instead of the bigger issue, which is that you feel hurt or angry or whatever emotion you're feeling that needs to be addressed. Why bother addressing your pain if we can establish that whatever caused you pain didn't really happen the way you remember in the first place?
This is particularly effective because our emotions are *not* always "valid", in the sense that they are not always a reflection of reality. They're always "valid" in the sense that you really do feel them. But we can, and do, feel hurt, for instance, when no one actually hurt us. This particular tactic is also useful for an abuser, and is quite a common justification for a lot of abusive and toxic relationship rules in poly relationships. They justify punitive behaviour.
So it's very important that we learn to use our feelings as signposts that something is wrong, and then address what's wrong. That way, we can't get sidetracked by an abuser attempting to gaslight us by interrogation and the discovery of totally natural holes in memory, and we also won't use our emotions as blunt objects with which to beat our partners over the head when we are feeling insecure to make them change behaviour that isn't really harming us but which may be harmful to *them* if we make them stop (i.e. impositions on autonomy issues).
I've been talking about abuse a lot lately, and I recently got into a discussion about how pretty much everyone exhibits some behaviours that could be described as abusive, simply because our culture accepts those behaviours as normal. I've also been hinting at a series of blog posts I have in the making, explaining my own experience with abusive men and how the particular combination of traits that add up to my self-esteem seemed to have saved me from being abused by these abusive men.
And it occurred to me that there is a connection to these three things - blocking a friend, abusive behaviour being cultural, and being less susceptible to certain kinds of abuse. Gaslighting is where someone breaks down another person's sense of reality by insisting that the things that a victim knows are true really aren't true. With factual claims, that's really hard to do, but with *perceptions*, it's surprisingly easy. Very generally speaking, it's the dismissal of someone's experience until they no longer believe their own experience and instead look to the abuser to provide the framework for their reality.
So, for example, when a kid hurts themselves, telling them that they don't feel hurt or that "it isn't that bad" is a form of gaslighting. If successful, eventually the kid learns to dismiss their own experience of pain and could lead to not treating something serious because they don't identify pain anymore.
Telling me what I think or feel in contradiction to what I've said I think or feel is a form of gaslighting. Online, it most often takes the form of seeing someone's behaviour, and then projecting motivations onto that person to explain their behaviour. People who take welfare assistance are lazy. People who are late think their time is more valuable than others. Women are just crazy.
So, back to the part where I believe that I have a particular combination of traits that interferes with people's ability to emotionally abuse me in certain ways, I think that part of the reason why I flip my lid and get so pissed off at people online is because I intuitively recognize this behaviour as abusive without having the cognitive, conscious understanding or language for this behaviour. When I feel cornered, I lash out. Telling me what I think or feel causes me to lash out as if I were being cornered. This reaction seems to many to be a complete overreaction to what appears to be a simple exchange from a nobody on the internet.
But, to me, I react as though I've just seen someone deliberately push a baby into traffic. So that's the connection my brain made - I think that people are participating in gaslighting all the fucking time and it's socially acceptable to do so. Which means that it's really difficult to identify gaslighting when it's being done to you "for real", i.e. in some kind of intimate relationship like a partner or family member, because, to most people, that's just how discussions and arguments go. We've probably even said those things ourselves.
When it happens to me, I get angry. Maybe if we all got a little more "unreasonably angry" when this happened, our culture wouldn't treat it as "normal".

"Gaslighting doesn’t have to be deliberate ... We learn how to control and manipulate each other very naturally. The distinguishing feature between someone who gaslights and someone who doesn’t, is an internalized paradigm of ownership."
"I believe that gaslighting is happening culturally and interpersonally on an unprecedented scale, and that this is the result of a societal framework where we pretend everyone is equal while trying simultaneously to preserve inequality."
"The book The Gaslight Effect refers to a type of gaslighting called glamour gaslighting. This is where the gaslighter showers you with special attention, but never actually gives you what you need. They put you on a pedestal, but then they are not there, in fact they may get angry at you, when you need a shoulder to cry on."This is one of the many reasons why I have a problem with so-called "goddess worship" or the belief that women should be worshiped as "queens" or that they are "better" than men. Women are put on pedestals, but only until they do something that shows how human they are, and then the anger comes out - "slut", "whore", "bitch", "crazy". You're only a "queen" until you step out of line, and then you're lower than dirt.
"In another type of gaslighting, the gaslighter is always transformed into the victim. Whenever you bring up a problem, you find yourself apologizing by the end of the conversation."
"Losing spots in your memory makes it very plausible when someone tells you that they cannot trust your memory. It makes it very plausible when they tell you that you are abusive. But, it is normal to lose your memory when you are being gaslighted. In fact, it is one of the signs that you should look for."This is one of the biggest problems with abuse in skeptical people or skeptical communities. Because we know that memories are fallible and malleable, an abuser can use that information to justify his gaslighting by pointing out that his victim's memory can't be trusted. But, somehow his memory can be? Sure, having holes in one's memory is normal, but when someone uses that fact to dismiss what you're saying about how you *feel*, which is an internal, subjective process that they have no control over and no direct observation of, you should be wary.
It's particularly subtle and effective when something bothers you, but you don't talk about it right away, or if the thing that bothers you is a *pattern* that has developed over time. That makes it so much more plausible and easy for the abuser to quiz and harangue you about the details of *factual events* about which you might be fuzzy after some time has passed. This way, they can focus the argument on the details of your memory instead of the bigger issue, which is that you feel hurt or angry or whatever emotion you're feeling that needs to be addressed. Why bother addressing your pain if we can establish that whatever caused you pain didn't really happen the way you remember in the first place?
This is particularly effective because our emotions are *not* always "valid", in the sense that they are not always a reflection of reality. They're always "valid" in the sense that you really do feel them. But we can, and do, feel hurt, for instance, when no one actually hurt us. This particular tactic is also useful for an abuser, and is quite a common justification for a lot of abusive and toxic relationship rules in poly relationships. They justify punitive behaviour.
So it's very important that we learn to use our feelings as signposts that something is wrong, and then address what's wrong. That way, we can't get sidetracked by an abuser attempting to gaslight us by interrogation and the discovery of totally natural holes in memory, and we also won't use our emotions as blunt objects with which to beat our partners over the head when we are feeling insecure to make them change behaviour that isn't really harming us but which may be harmful to *them* if we make them stop (i.e. impositions on autonomy issues).
"The problem was that I did not realize that sometimes empathy is not the right approach. Sometimes the right approach is to not engage and instead to make space. Make space for yourself and your gaslighter by setting boundaries. Make so much space for your abuser that they can no longer effect you."This is exactly what I do when I block someone on social media, although I wouldn't call every altercation "abuse". Sometimes empathy is not the right approach. Usually, the reason why I've gotten into the argument in the first place is because I'm empathizing *with someone else* which makes my opponent out to be (or feel like) a "bad guy". Although I *do* empathize with my opponent, my empathy for the other side is both stronger and more important because they are the ones getting hurt more. When I block someone, empathizing with that person is no longer the right approach to take, and making so much space for them that they can no longer affect me is the necessary tool.
"It is ridiculous when someone tries to tell you who you are, what you feel, what you think, what you intended, or what you experienced. When it happens, you should be angry, puzzled, or maybe even concerned for them. You might stop, stunned, and ask “what would make you think that you could know what’s inside of me? Are you OK?"I actually had a whole other post on this topic that I couldn't make because FB disabled my account, so I'll address it here instead. I've been pondering over my most recent blocking of a friend who insisted on telling me what Im thinking. Normally I just rage about it for a while and move on. But today, my brain drew a connection, so I'm considering the validity of that connection and I don't have it all worked out yet, hence the dwelling.
I've been talking about abuse a lot lately, and I recently got into a discussion about how pretty much everyone exhibits some behaviours that could be described as abusive, simply because our culture accepts those behaviours as normal. I've also been hinting at a series of blog posts I have in the making, explaining my own experience with abusive men and how the particular combination of traits that add up to my self-esteem seemed to have saved me from being abused by these abusive men.
And it occurred to me that there is a connection to these three things - blocking a friend, abusive behaviour being cultural, and being less susceptible to certain kinds of abuse. Gaslighting is where someone breaks down another person's sense of reality by insisting that the things that a victim knows are true really aren't true. With factual claims, that's really hard to do, but with *perceptions*, it's surprisingly easy. Very generally speaking, it's the dismissal of someone's experience until they no longer believe their own experience and instead look to the abuser to provide the framework for their reality.
So, for example, when a kid hurts themselves, telling them that they don't feel hurt or that "it isn't that bad" is a form of gaslighting. If successful, eventually the kid learns to dismiss their own experience of pain and could lead to not treating something serious because they don't identify pain anymore.
Telling me what I think or feel in contradiction to what I've said I think or feel is a form of gaslighting. Online, it most often takes the form of seeing someone's behaviour, and then projecting motivations onto that person to explain their behaviour. People who take welfare assistance are lazy. People who are late think their time is more valuable than others. Women are just crazy.
So, back to the part where I believe that I have a particular combination of traits that interferes with people's ability to emotionally abuse me in certain ways, I think that part of the reason why I flip my lid and get so pissed off at people online is because I intuitively recognize this behaviour as abusive without having the cognitive, conscious understanding or language for this behaviour. When I feel cornered, I lash out. Telling me what I think or feel causes me to lash out as if I were being cornered. This reaction seems to many to be a complete overreaction to what appears to be a simple exchange from a nobody on the internet.
But, to me, I react as though I've just seen someone deliberately push a baby into traffic. So that's the connection my brain made - I think that people are participating in gaslighting all the fucking time and it's socially acceptable to do so. Which means that it's really difficult to identify gaslighting when it's being done to you "for real", i.e. in some kind of intimate relationship like a partner or family member, because, to most people, that's just how discussions and arguments go. We've probably even said those things ourselves.
When it happens to me, I get angry. Maybe if we all got a little more "unreasonably angry" when this happened, our culture wouldn't treat it as "normal".











