Jan. 16th, 2008

joreth: (Silent Bob Headbang)
Woo hoo!  I sold 2 photographs this week!

I have an online stock photo agent, mainly for the prestige I get when I say I'm a published photographer and the ability to write stuff off on my taxes.  It certainly isn't for the money (stock $ is a joke at best - any potential income is made on reselling the same photo hundreds of times, which I currently am not popular enough to do)!  I sell a few photos a year for very little cash, but it makes me happy.  This is the first time I've sold two in one week and when I went to check my history, I noticed a previously sold photo wasn't bought for the usual web-sale I originally thought (they buy the lowest resolution to use on websites), but someone actually purchased an Extended RF License for my very first photograph that I took back in 1997!  That photos has been published in 3 photography anthologies so far and the current stock use of an RF license means someone buys the original resolution and can actually put it on items for resale.  So I'm excited - people actually like my work enough to pay for it!

If anyone is curious, my stock library is located here:  http://www.fotolia.com/p/126252 

**I found where one of my images was used!  www.mbs-yoga.com - It's the white flowers in the "Wellness" button.  If I find any more, I'll post them too.
joreth: (Dobert Demons of Stupidity)
So, today I was asked by a coworker what I thought about the big events that are supposed to happen in 2012.  It took some effort to dredge up the faintest of recollections that there's some astrological predictions about the end of the world and other nifty events based on the Mayan calendar.  His claim that we should not reject it out of hand was that other natural events have always corresponded to significant dates in history and the stars often accurately predict the course of human events.

How do otherwise intelligent people continue to fall for this stuff?  I mean, I lack extensive scientific knowledge, so when I come across something over my head, I research it.  Sometimes that research includes just asking ya'll who are smarter than me and I get soundly put in my place (i.e. the burning saltwater guy).  But the point is, I still research it before I start spreading it around.

So, with very few details left in my memory, since I dismissed this particular myth years ago, I tried to explain about the differences in cultural calendars and the difficulty with matching them up, and different mythologies having nothing at all to do with our current culture, etc.  

He made some reference to major events that happened on "significant" dates on our Gregorian calendar, and I pointed out that the Asian cultures don't use the same calendar and nothing important happened to them on those dates.  I also pointed out all the "signficant" dates where nothing happened at all.  I tried to point out that our use of "significant" in numbers is fairly arbitrary, and other cultures, other calendars, etc. all use different numbers.  I also tried to reference the fact that humans are very good at seeing patterns, even when there isn't one.  The whole phenomenon of remembering a "prediction" when it came true and not remembering the hundreds of other predictions and dreams that never came true, or the events that happened that no one predicted, for instance.  The idea of the statistical liklihood of chance allows for events that look like patterns in the small scale, but when examined from farther away (or a longer range of data) show that chance makes it entirely possible to have happened in that manner, as another one.

So I'm referencing a bunch of websites that debunk this particular myth to show him tomorrow at work.  Anyone care to chime in?

Banners