I haven't done much looking into the whole son/grandson issue, but it was pointed out somewhere that if she wasn't faking the pregnancy, then she intentionally endangered the life of her own premature, Downs-syndrome baby for the sake of her political career which, IMO, is even worse.
I didn't really go into detail her claims about birth control, etc., but being against any form of birth control (without the scientific evidence to support that it's actually harmful, which is not what she is claiming as far as I know) while not including condoms in that ban only reinforces my own opinion that she is not "feminist", her membership in a group that calls themselves "feminist" notwithstanding. It's still anti-woman's-right-to-choose if you only support the one form of birth control that requires male cooperation.
The majority of the claims in the article stick with her lack of experience, not the more sensationalist issues surrounding her that *I* find most appalling, and those issues I did not go into detail about.
no subject
I didn't really go into detail her claims about birth control, etc., but being against any form of birth control (without the scientific evidence to support that it's actually harmful, which is not what she is claiming as far as I know) while not including condoms in that ban only reinforces my own opinion that she is not "feminist", her membership in a group that calls themselves "feminist" notwithstanding. It's still anti-woman's-right-to-choose if you only support the one form of birth control that requires male cooperation.
The majority of the claims in the article stick with her lack of experience, not the more sensationalist issues surrounding her that *I* find most appalling, and those issues I did not go into detail about.