Hahaha, this is SO familiar and made me laugh so hard. Yes!
I would like to point out one flaw in DSD's logic that I think got missed, which is that while the Dominant has a framework of places that they may not go (i.e. anywhere outside stated hard limits or the boundaries of that relationship, or anywhere at all that is beyond where the submissive consents to go at any particular time) within that framework they are still the person who controls the direction of the scene, much like the director of a company has rules they must follow about how they treat their employees, but still remains 'in charge' of the company (for as long as employees consent to remaining employed by that company).
(As opposed to a 'service top' who does *precisely* what the 'bottom' asks for, and is less in charge of the scene than the person on the receiving end)
no subject
I would like to point out one flaw in DSD's logic that I think got missed, which is that while the Dominant has a framework of places that they may not go (i.e. anywhere outside stated hard limits or the boundaries of that relationship, or anywhere at all that is beyond where the submissive consents to go at any particular time) within that framework they are still the person who controls the direction of the scene, much like the director of a company has rules they must follow about how they treat their employees, but still remains 'in charge' of the company (for as long as employees consent to remaining employed by that company).
(As opposed to a 'service top' who does *precisely* what the 'bottom' asks for, and is less in charge of the scene than the person on the receiving end)